• About
  • Videos
  • Music
  • Photography
  • Blog
  • Contact Me
Menu

Raymond Thang

  • About
  • Videos
  • Music
  • Photography
  • Blog
  • Contact Me
×
kviff-the-cakemaker.jpg

"The Cakemaker" Review

Food can be cathartic. It can be a symbol of love or a work of art or something that you make and consume purely to survive. Something I love a lot is when food is used in a meaningful way in a story. Enter: "The Cakemaker".

Here's the premise (spoilers for the first 10 minutes of the movie). A German baker, Thomas (Tim Kalkhof) meets an married Israeli man, Oren (Roy Miller). They become lovers until the married man dies. The baker decides to move to Berlin and seek out his lover's widow, Anat (Sarah Adler) and son, Itai (Tamir Ben-Yehuda).

I want to start by saying that I really enjoyed the movie but there were some things that I had problems with from a storytelling standpoint. But before that, I wanted to praise Kalkhof and Adler's performances and their beautiful chemistry. They bond over food and grief and by being with each other on screen, it made things feel like things were going to be okay. It's very sweet and endearing and I loved watching both of them very much.

Another thing I really loved was its symbolic use of food. It looks yummy, sure, but it's more focused on the process of making food and making food with other people which is something I would love to see more of in movies. There's also the conflict between eating for pleasure and eating what you're allowed to eat. i.e., kosher foods -something I found absolutely fascinating.

There are some things I wasn't a fan of. To start with, the movie is about grief and by having a character die so early in the movie, I found it a struggle at times to empathize with what the main characters were going through. The character of Oren is slowly filled in posthumously with a much needed flashback towards the end. Even after all this, I still don't think it was enough to understand this character and to fully empathize with the grief and I think it would've helped to establish a more intimate narrative between Thomas and Oren before tragedy strikes. This way, as an audience member, we feel invested in their relationship without the air of mystery and without enduring the weirdly placed flashback later on. Another thing that I wasn't a fan of was the overly stretched out mystery of will she or won't she find out who Thomas really is. Rather, the film should've stuck with the idea of, when she finds out, what will happen. There were moments where if Adler's character just kept doing what she was doing, she would've easily known the answer and the dramatic tension would then be switched to how her character would deal with this discovery early on.

All this being said, The Cakemaker is still a very emotional movie with two great main characters featuring some great performances and it's worth checking out.

"The Cakemaker" Review

Raymond Thang October 7, 2018
Comment
default.jpg

"Private Life" Review

"Private Life" follows two people in their 40's to 50's (Paul Giamatti, Kathryn Hahn) on their journey to conceive a child -a plot that I couldn't've cared less about to be honest. Like all great stories, this takes hyper-realized characters and makes me empathize with their problems. And I fell in love with almost everything about the movie.

Kudos to Hahn and Giamatti for portraying one of the most rawest couple since Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy in Before Midnight. You root for them even though, at times, they are at each other's throats. Imagine spending time with any couple, you guys have fun but there are times when you end up in the middle of an intense argument and that makes you feel super uncomfortable, but you still love them (or maybe that's just the experience I have with every couple I hang out with), anyway, this is the naturalism I'm referring to. It also helps that writer/director Tamara Jenkins' script is, hilarious and really depressing and never do these two tones clash. The writing kept surprising me at almost every turn -laughs and tears come at the most unexpected moments and certain character decisions, although dumb, come from a place that's logical to them. There's one character, Sadie, (played brilliantly by Kayli Carter) that's kind of snobby but the way she acts around others and how the things she does comes from a place of love, makes her one of the most memorable characters I've ever come across. I really hope Carter gets recognition from this because she's fucking fantastic.

Something I also loved was the use of whites, greys, and blues. The world of the movie often looks cold and matches the hardships of the people we follow. It was a beautiful touch to set it in autumn and having the season reflect the biological clocks of two main adult characters. It reminded me of how effectively the movie "Another Year" (one of my favourite movies) used its seasons to convey tone and character psychology. Situations feel desperate and sad but there's the hope of spring and I love where the story ends up.

One thing I have a minor problem with is this one scene with Sadie that she mentions but we never see. For a moment, it confused me and made me question what she said but it was quickly cleared up. It's a very minor issue I have and that scene in particular stood out to me.

Overall, I thought Private Life is one of the most beautifully constructed stories ever. It feels intimate, but not in an overly romantic way. I love the characters, I love the performances, the script, the direction, the visuals -the whole shabang. If you're looking for a realistic and intimate dramedy, this is where you want to be. Fucking amazing movie!

"Private Life" Review

Raymond Thang October 6, 2018
Comment
A-Star-Is-Born-Movie-2018-4140310274-1535731413913.jpg

"A Star Is Born (2018)" Review

"A Star Is Born" is the third remake of the 1937 classic and like all other versions, it's about a falling star falling in love with someone who becomes a rising one. This version is directed by and stars Bradley Cooper along side Stefani Germanotta aka Mother Monster.

As far as love stories go, this one hits deep and taps into a highly personal place in its characters. Big things happen but at the end of the day the highest stakes are the ones they have in each other. Let me briefly compare it to La La Land. In La La Land, the movie was good because of the music and the technicality that was on display while the love story was mediocre. In A Star Is Born, the love story is extremely effective while the music is mediocre. I'm sorry, I'm just not into modern pop music and there was a moment where I was legitimately confused whether the music was supposed to be intentionally bad or was simply terrible. I'm a music snob for sure and not everyone's gonna agree with what I just said. I mean, "Shallow" is a good song but it's no "The Man that Got Away", you know?

Bradley Cooper is as amazing in front of the camera as he is behind the camera. He totally understands how to frame the shots and when to cut away from a scene with a majority of the musical portions being made up of mediums and close-ups on the actors' faces and that cut in the end of the movie blew my fucking mind! Sam Elliott and Dave Chappelle are great as well and I wished I saw more of the latter but, oh well. One performance I was totally not prepared for was Stefani Germanotta's. Holy shit, can she act. You believed and empathized with Cooper and Germanotta's undeniable chemistry and I wouldn't be surprised if both of them got some awards recognition from this.

Overall, A Star Is Born is a potent and gritty love story about two flawed people. Their relationship, smart writing, and tour de force performances make this remake worthwhile. It's just I think the music kind of sucks and prevents me from loving it completely. But if you're into pop music and Mother Monster, you'll probably love it.

"A Star Is Born (2018)" Review

Raymond Thang October 3, 2018
Comment
5baa5d9acca69.image.jpg

"Hold the Dark" Review

"Hold the Dark" Review

Raymond Thang September 17, 2018

"Hold the Dark" is directed by Jeremy Saulnier (Blue Ruin, Green Room) and written by longtime collaborator Macon Blair and is an adaptation of a book by William Giraldi. In it, a wolf expert (Jeffrey Wright) is sent out to find the wolf that took the child of a woman (Riley Keough). I would've been totally happy to see a movie if that was all that happens. But just like any Saulnier movie, anything can and will happen. Usually, that's what I love about his movies, but not this time.

What I also like about his movies is that they have virtually no exposition and everything is put together with pinpoint precision. Macon Blair (I Don't Feel at Home in This World Anymore) does a very good job of balancing naturalistic dialogue with exposition but the stuff in between really feels bleak for the sake of bleakness. Perhaps that's also the fault of the source material. It sets up all these questions and in the end we don't get any answers... But that's the point. But if there's no answers to anything, what's the point of even making that point, you know?

For a two hour movie, this feels longer than it needed to be. As nice as the editing and cinematography can be, there's just so many moody shots in the snow that I can watch before I start feeling bored. And that's what it was for me most of the time. The first third of it was cool but then it takes a weird turn and nothing makes sense after that turn. Again, this is intentional, but that being said, I hate where the story goes and it feels pointless.

The performances are super heavy and one actor that stands out (in a bad way) is Alexander Skarsgård. He's trying his best but his facial expressions are so limited that he becomes boring to watch. He's good in other things like True Blood and Diary of a Teenage Girl. He just doesn't fit with the movie.

If you're a nihilist and into super bleak, depressing, violent stuff, you might find some enjoyment out of this but everyone else should stay clear.

Comment
mid90s_02.jpg

"Mid90s" Reaction

There's one Pixies song that I absolutely adore and I've always wanted to see it featured in a coming-of-age movie set in the 90's. I also spent a lot of my childhood playing Street Fighter II with my brother. Then came Jonah Hill's "Mid90s" which featured both of those things. Coming-of-age stories are my shit and I can't express how stoked I was to watch an amalgamation of all these things. This is gonna be a very biased and unpolished reaction to the movie. The film isn't that long but is very dense and I wasn't able to catch most of the dialogue so I think I need to revisit the film to formulate a fuller opinion of it. But here's what I can come up with:

The story follows a 13 year old boy played by Sunny Suljic (Killing of a Sacred Deer, and God of War 2018). He lives with a single mother (Katherine Waterston) and an abusive older brother (Lucas Hedges). His life sucks and so he befriends a group of local skater kids and things get pretty intense. One of the many great things this film does is make one moment hilarious and the next moment feel dramatic without causing a viewer to feel emotional whiplash, at least for me anyway. The sound design and editing feels primal at times and captures the matter-of-fact grungy aesthetic extremely well. Characters are flawed and often highly problematic but the film never judges any of them and I think there's something very beautiful about that.

Its soundtrack is excellent and matches the rhythm of the editing. There's one scene at a house party that I specifically was fawning over that I can watch over and over again. The score itself is by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross and it sounds exactly like what you'd expect it to sound like from a typical Reznor/Ross collaborative effort, you know, moody synths and piano stuff -It's an interesting contrast to the old school hip-hop, skater punk, and grunge but it personally didn't work for me and it just sounded super boring. That's a bummer because I love their work on David Fincher movies and Before the Flood.

I also have a bone to pick with a decision that the characters made towards the end of the film that barely made sense but just seemed to have been done to make a certain thing happen in the plot. It felt cheap and it felt like an illogical decision to be made in an otherwise intelligent movie. And then there was the ending (which I won't spoil) but I think it worked for the most part but I would've personally preferred it to have addressed some of the lingering tension between its main group of characters. Oh well.

Mid90s is an honest look at life as a kid in the 90s. It looks gorgeous and feels like a successor to the Linklater films of old. I very much look forward to what Jonah Hill will do after this.

"Mid90s" Reaction

Raymond Thang September 15, 2018
Comment
Screen-Shot-2018-08-29-at-7.23.04-AM.png

"Searching" Review

"Searching" is a neat little thriller about a missing girl that takes place over laptop, and phone screens. In the movie, John Cho plays a father coping with the disappearance of his teenage daughter (Michelle La) while a detective (Debra Messing) is assigned to the case. Cho's charisma and empathy is hard to deny in this heartbreaking performance and plays well opposite Messing's detective Rosemary Vick.

This so called "screen life" genre (think the Unfriended movies) is a neat storytelling device and also serves as a great contemporary way to develop its characters and I was very much on board for the most part. Watching a character type out a message and replacing it with a different message while sifting through a myriad of relevant Google Chrome tabs is awesome. For once, a thriller is able to trust its audience with so much information and urges us to pay close attention. But then the movie decides to do everything in its power to hold us by the hand. I think that if the movie is so intricate in its set ups, the viewer will have no problems keeping up. Towards the end, it kept revisiting clues that we've seen many times before and it takes so long for the movie to get to the point that had already been clearly established. This is dumb and stands out in a competently constructed mystery. The movie is also hellbent on sticking to showing the entire story through different screens and news footage no matter the cost (to its detriment) and its final act does feel like a race to the finish line and I would've liked for the movie to have taken more time to wrap things up. There were also a lot of logistical issues I have with some of the reveals that would've worked in other mysteries but not in a mystery where social media and the internet is front and centre.

Searching is a slickly edited, well-acted, entry-level thriller that feels very emotional and has a lot of fun with its gimmick. The twists' reveals are clunky and extremely heavy handed and the pacing is a bit all over the place in its final act, but that being said, the movie is very much worth a watch on a big screen.

"Searching" Review

Raymond Thang September 1, 2018

Comment
sharpobjects02.jpg

"Sharp Objects" Review

CW: "Sharp Objects" contains graphic depictions of self harm, and substance abuse. If you're someone who struggles with these things and are depressed, you should stay away from this.

"Sharp Objects" follows reporter Camille Preaker (Amy Adams) whom is assigned to investigate a missing person case in her home town of Wind Gap, Missouri -a shitty town full of shitty people.

When I heard that Jean-Marc Vallée (Dallas Buyers Club, Wild, Big Little Lies) was directing an HBO mini-series based on a book by Gillian Flynn (Gone Girl), I was definitely excited. After watching its eight episodes, I can say for sure that it lives up to the hype. From the very first episode, the show conjures up a very bleak and lonely atmosphere. In fact the first episode is pure atmosphere and there's never any wasted line of dialogue. The American Gothic horror vibe works in tandem to create one of the most well-realized fictional settings ever created. The main mystery is brutal and ties into the story of the main protagonist and it feels personal to her (not unlike what "Top of the Lake" does with its plot and main character). The writing is very naturalistic and it's easy to forget that you're watching a TV show. That's a testament to the show's amazing writers (including Flynn) and its amazing cast. I love Amy Adams and this is probably her heaviest role so far. We spend a lot of time with her driving around the town in her car listening to Led Zeppelin. There's usually no dialogue during these scenes but her presence adds a lot of vulnerability to those moments. Patricia Clarkson's performance as Adora (Camille's mother) is creepy and threatening. Eliza Scanlen's enigmatic performance as Amma (Camille's half-sister) makes that character's complicated relationship with Camille even more complicated to watch. I also wanted to give a shout out to Miguel Sandoval's performance as Frank Curry (Camille's editor) whom is the one character we can cling to for a moment of solace amidst the bleakness.

I love Vallée's use of the flashback motif. They're literal split second glimpses into Camille's past and even though they're extremely brief, the imagery always feel dense and it's a beautiful and quick way to develop characters' backstories and simultaneously foreshadow things to come. They're also organically weaved into the psychology of her character which is great and I wish every flashback in every show and movie were done like this. I also really love the show's editing, its music editing in particular adds a lot to the atmosphere and even takes full control during a lot of the endings of each episode. Musical montages can be cheesy in your typical procedural, but in this it always leaves me with something surreal, powerful and disturbing. It begs you to watch carefully and then absorb everything after each episode. It's one of those dramas that requires a lot of breathing room in between so I wouldn't recommend someone to marathon it all in one go.

One thing that I have problems with is the character "Alan" (Henry Czerny). He has an interesting backstory and his relationships are just as complicated as other characters'. But by the end he didn't have much to do besides listen to music. There's so much they could've done with his character and that's a bit of a disappointing anomaly in what is nearly a perfect series and definitely one of the best TV dramas ever created.

"Sharp Objects" Review

Raymond Thang August 30, 2018
Comment
sayoasa_final_14.jpg

"Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms" Review

"Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms" is a fantasy epic written and directed by Mari Okada (writer of Anohana, Dragon Pilot and many many other anime and live action TV shows and movies) and follows the touching tale of a man and his adoptive mother over the span of several decades. 

Something I found immediately striking is the movie's use of lighting that blends beautifully with its immersive and highly detailed background art. I do find the character design to be lackluster and at times hard to identify. Visually, no one character stood out and that's very unfortunate because I do think these characters are interesting and memorable to a degree.

From a writing standpoint, dialogue feels cheesy and a bit tropey but there are flashes of brilliance when the story focuses less on the high fantasy setting and more on this intimate bond between Maquia and her son Ariel. The movie does time jumps like it's nobody's business and the transitions feel fluid and is often accompanied by some decent exposition that doesn't stand out too much. The movie does explore other plots with a lot of its more important and dramatic beats in these subplots coming out of nowhere and mostly falling flat (I'm referring to the character arcs of Lang and Krim). Because the movie tells its story over several major time jumps, the progression for the side characters feel extremely rushed and result in confusing and unearned decisions. Although these moments don't take up much of the runtime, they are noticeably off-putting and dramatically weak.  

"Maquia" is a movie that wears its heart on its sleeve. For better or for worse. Okada is a writer known for her romantic and hyper melodramatic style. If you're a viewer who prefers emotions over story and character, you will definitely enjoy this movie. The scope of the narrative is ambitious but the result feels rushed and juggles too many ideas during its limiting 115 minutes. That being said, its unapologetically heartwarming thesis is hard not to relate to.

"Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms" Review

Raymond Thang August 30, 2018
Comment
180712-Schager-Mission-Impossible-hero__ihu4pb.jpg

"Mission: Impossible - Fallout" Review

"Mission: Impossible - Fallout" is a paradox to me. On one hand, I watch movies for the characters and story but Fallout has a super convoluted story that might not make sense if you really think about it and the characters are mostly used as plot devices. A franchise that starts with action scenes and works backwards from there shouldn't equate to anything great no matter how much fun it has. Lo and behold, Fallout is a rare exception. The film is self aware that people pay to see an entry to a long-running action franchise for its insane action -and it fulfills that request in the most spectacular fashion possible. 

The mission, if you choose to accept it, is to prevent a bunch of bombs from blowing up and killing a bunch of innocent people. To boil the plot down to its most basic parts, this is as simple as it gets. There's a lot of deception going on and a lot of characters will change motivations on and off screen on a whim -whatever. We have our Macguffins -off we go!

I wanted to give a massive shout-out to the team that worked on the audio for the movie. I saw it in IMAX and the sound mix was top notch to say the least. Shrapnel rips across the speakers and vehicles will surround you unlike any other film. Everything sounds dynamic and crisp and I love it when a movie pays so much attention to how it sounds. ‎Lorne Balfe's super percussive Fury Road-like score is synced up to the rhythm of the action and the flow from one idea to the next always feel kinetic and exciting. You will not be getting the full experience if you're listening to this movie on anything less than an amazing speaker system.

The film has no less than ten action sequences and it constantly looks great. The best part about having Tom Cruise doing the stunts himself is that the movie can show his choreography in wides and often unbroken takes. One moment he's doing a HALO jump and another moment will have him pull off a corkscrew dive with a helicopter. It's mesmerizing and it never gets old and we're always aware of where everyone is at all times. This movie solidifies Tom Cruise as one of the greatest on-screen stunt performers of all time and this is the best that he and the action has ever been in the franchise and in action movies period.

Fallout is a fantastic, hardcore, white knuckle action epic and is by far the highest Mission Impossible has ever soared. Even though Rogue Nation isn't required viewing, Fallout complements Rogue Nation in all the right ways. The action is some of the best ever captured on film and the presentation is extremely polished. This is definitely a film that you have to see on the biggest screen possible since so much of the movie's magic, at least for me, relies on how grand everything looks and sounds. That and a weak story and somewhat stocky characters are the main reasons why I don't consider the film to be one of the greats. Though it's been over three hours since I walked out of the cinema and I can still feel the adrenaline coursing through my veins. 

"Mission: Impossible - Fallout" Review

Raymond Thang July 28, 2018
Comment
stby__1.2.1.00000001_R2_CROP_rgb-996x515.jpg

"Sorry to Bother You" Review

This movie is bananas. 

"Sorry to Bother You" is Boots Riley's feature length directorial debut and to describe it... well, film critic Christy Lemire said that it's as "if Spike Lee and Charlie Kaufman got together to do a remake of Office Space... that might begin to scratch the surface of what this movie is like." and yeah, it's like that.  It's a highly unique movie and it's visceral, and unpredictable. Don't let the high concept surrealist satire stuff discourage you from seeing it because, at the end of the day, the characters' journeys are super easy to follow and the movie is so meticulous in setting up everything that when something insane does happen, it has already been telegraphed in an earlier scene and will make sense in its own weird way.

The movie is a great piece about identity, and perception (to grossly summarize) and it pushes the medium of film to its limits. It draws attention to its surrealism and it never feels pretentious. I personally really love its art design. No part of its art direction seems wasted as every piece of set dressing and costume is deliberate and means something. I think the movie does bite off more than it can chew, but I have to hand it to Boots Riley and his team for succeeding in realizing something so bizarre and out there.

"Sorry to Bother You" Review

Raymond Thang July 23, 2018
Comment
EG_03734_rgb-1200x800.jpg

"Eighth Grade" Review

I love watching coming-of-age movies. So this is going to be an extremely biased review.

"Eighth Grade" is directed by Bo Burnham and it follows Kayla (Elsie Fisher) in her last week of middle school. 

I love this movie. Burnham has a deep understanding of late adolescence. It's such a crucial but overwhelming time in a person's life and this movie captures that intimately. It knows when to be funny and when to use humour to undercut tension and to enhance the drama. Although I found myself laughing at this poor girl, I also found her endearing and sweet. She has a social media persona that she uses and that provides a beautiful contrast to how awkwardly her character behaves around other people in her daily life and is a great insight into her character. 

Elsie Fisher is FUCKING INCREDIBLE. She's able to so effortlessly articulate Burnham's meticulously idiosyncratic script and directions on camera. She's hilarious and vulnerable and her presence moved me to tears. Josh Hamilton is excellent as the father and compliments Fisher's performance. There're a few scenes in this where it hit me hard. You'll know what I'm referring to if you've seen it.

I want to praise the movie's use of practical naturalistic-looking lighting. The inside of houses are lit like normal houses with different lighting temperatures. When Kayla is on her phone, the lighting is actually coming from her phone and she's actually reacting to Instagram and DMs in real time. I also want to give huge props to the makeup department for making the characters look like kids. Kayla and most of the other youths in the movie have an acne, or cover it up with makeup. It's this attention to detail that I really appreciated and helped to make the movie more immersive than it already was.

I cannot recommend Eighth Grade enough. It's an important film for this era and I can't think of a reason not to see it. Young people and older viewers would definitely find it highly insightful and the fact that it's rated R is dumb. Kids can see super violent action movies but not see movies about characters like themselves talk about sex. This is such a beautiful and honest take on growing up. It's not pretty and it's often crude but that's why it feels so realistic. If you or you know somebody who's a teenager or an adolescent, show them this movie. They might need it more than you think.

Gucci!

"Eighth Grade" Review

Raymond Thang July 22, 2018
Comment
CBL-08564_R2-(1).jpg

"Ant-Man and the Wasp" Review

I don't really have much to say about "Ant-Man and the Wasp". It's one of the safest and least controversial action movies I've ever seen. If you know how an action super hero movie goes, this movie checks off all the requirements. We got some fun looking action set pieces. We got charismatic heroes fighting against generic and sometimes unnecessary villains. We got a generic musical score that you probably won't remember upon exiting the theater. Etc etc. Although this movie is light and fun and the comedy is well timed, I think it's ultimately a forgettable story about some of Marvel's least interesting characters. By the way, they've managed to retcon Paul Rudd's character from a likable, goofy, yet highly intelligent dude into a goofy, sometimes annoying duffus. As fun as the performances are (though I'm not sure if Evangeline Lilly is actually a boring actor or if it's just her character that's boring. It's probably both.) and as fun as the action can be (though I'm bothered by how inconsistent the physics of the movie is), it's not enough for me to find the movie interesting. 

The movie really takes a dump in its final beats. Everything is quickly and haphazardly resolved and it feels hollow, super convenient and incomplete. One of the motivations of one character is resolved so easily and suddenly that it's a legitimate cop out. The script absolutely could have benefited from some more rewrites. Also, don't even bother with the second post-credits scene. If you've seen the trailer, you've seen the scene. It's totally not worth it. It's just an ant playing drums for around 6 seconds. Spoilers. Sorry but not sorry.

"Ant-Man and the Wasp" Review

Raymond Thang July 8, 2018
Comment
sicario-2-soldado-sol_d41_13330_r.jpg

"Sicario: Day of the Soldado" Review

"Sicario: Day of the Soldado" is written by Taylor Sheridan and is a continuation to one of the movies from his frontier trilogy. Stefano Sollima takes over as director and Dariusz Wolski takes over as cinematographer (you may recognize his work in a bunch of Ridley Scott, Tim Burton and Gore Verbinski Pirates of the Caribbean movies). Although the characters are rich and interesting and complicated (things that I love), they are framed in such a way that makes it hard for me to follow. What made the first Sicario so great is that the narrative is primarily focused on Emily Blunt's character. We know what she knows and we find out what she finds out roughly at the same time. She's naive and gets pushed around and we in turn feel like we've been had by the end of that movie. With its sequel, we follow four different characters in roughly three different narratives. I really liked the teenage girl character in this (played by Isabela Moner whom gives an incredibly powerful performance) and I was rooting for her story. This made up about a third of the movie and for the other two thirds of it, I felt lost in the script's abyss of morally ambiguous characters with nothing else to cling onto but Benicio del Toro and Josh Brolin's performances. These parts do eventually come together and some of it works but a lot of it didn't. The final act specifically felt like a cop out and the ending is unintentionally cheesy.

With the exception of a claustrophobic set piece that takes place on a dirt road in the middle of the movie, Sicario 2 looks bland and pales in comparison to the highly calculated editing, shot compositions, and direction of the first movie. Tension is still present but it's not nearly as tight as its predecessor.

The musical motifs from the first film from the late Jóhann Jóhannsson return, though, instead of not knowing what's going to happen and hearing the dread in the score, Hildur Guðnadóttir's score feels similar and recontextualizes the dread. We know what some of these characters are like and vaguely where things are going this time around and the music feels very on-the-edge and grotesque. It's a very effective score for sure and it elevates the drama of the scenes where it's incorporated.

Day of the Soldado isn't as polished from a filmmaking standout as the first Sicario. Instead, it feels like a standard Hollywood movie which I'm pretty sure is the last thing that a Sicario movie wants to be.

"Sicario: Day of the Soldado" Review

Raymond Thang June 29, 2018
Comment
incredibles-2-image.jpg

"Incredibles 2" Review

*epileptic seizure warning*

The Incredibles make their triumphant return in a sequel that pretty much everyone had been asking for for the last fourteen years. Does it live up to the hype? Yes.

From writer/director Brad Bird (director of the previous Incredibles movie, The Iron Giant, that George Clooney movie, Mission Impossible 4, and one of my personal favourites, Ratatouille) comes a slickly directed, fast pace action movie with a strong focus on its incredible (excuse the pun) superhero family. While the first one focused more on Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson), this one focuses more on Elastigirl (Holly Hunter). We follow her on missions as an illegal superhero and it provides us with some of the most creative uses of her stretchy powers and some of the most insanely well-edited and well-shot motorcycle scenes ever. Watching her in action is exhilarating and is worth the price of admission alone. Meanwhile, Mr. Incredible is now a stay-at-home dad who struggles to balance helping Violet (Sarah Vowell) with her boy problems, keeping up Dash's (Huck Milner) math homework, and dealing with Jack-Jack's newly discovered superpowers. These moments are a welcomed break from the adrenaline-fueled pacing of Elastigirl's plot and provides most, if not, all the laughs of the movie. This is all good until we meet the movie's main villain, Screenslaver... Not a terrible villain, but it's not good either and the somewhat on-the-nose dialogue doesn't do it any favours. It's a superhero movie and it suffers from a common superhero movie problem. Fortunately, the rest of the movie is great enough to excuse the predictable story and simply serviceable villain.  

Incredibles 2 is a thrilling and satisfying continuation of a beloved Pixar classic. Although it falters in the villain department, it's genuinely great to see the Parr family back in action. Stay for the credits if you wanna experience some of Michael Giacchino's best work played over some sexy Saul Bass-esque art work.

"The Incredibles 2" Review

Raymond Thang June 15, 2018
Comment
image.jpg

"Hereditary" Review

Not only is "Hereditary" an amazing horror movie but it also happens to be a very compelling family drama. Similar to "The Babadook", Hereditary is a study of grief and how different people react and interact with it. The events that follows on screen are emotionally draining and often times traumatic. It's really unsettling and disturbing and having these horror beats rooted in grounded characters makes these moments all the more effective thanks to writer/director Ari Aster's stellar vision and masterful direction. 

From the opening shot alone, we get a sense that we're passing judgment on these people. It's an impossible shot and it feels Brechtian in its intention to distance the characters from the audience. Similar to how in Brechtian theatre where the audience knows that they're watching a play and knowing that makes the audience ask what the play is doing to them and to the political structure around it, at times, Hereditary makes the view aware that it's a movie because of some of its use of impossible geography and its choice in extreme wide shots and long takes. At least for me. (If you're interested in the formalism of it all, check out Aster's discussion of "The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover" with Cinefix on YouTube.) To summarize my thoughts here: the cinematography is great and it requires focus from the viewer. Every shot feels calculated and every camera move and edit walks the fine line between showing enough and holding back on what to reveal. 

The cast is solid with standout performances. Milly Shapiro takes a very quiet character and minimal dialogue and makes her character matter and empathetic. Toni Collette gives one of the most intense performances I've ever seen in a horror movie since Essie Davis in The Babadook. It does get a little bit out there towards the end, as far as dialogue and acting goes but I'm fine with that because the rest of the experience felt so... bananas (I was looking for a good word to describe the feeling but it escapes me as of writing this).

I don't feel the need to walk out of movies when they're good but this one made me feel trapped and traumatized and I thought about walking out to take a breather before resuming. I mean this in the best possible way because at the end of the day, I went to see a horror movie and that's exactly what I got. I think Hereditary stands up on its own next to classics like "The Shining" and "The Exorcist". It takes its time to set things up and the payoff is grand. Do be warned, this movie fucked me up and horror movies almost never fuck me up. Watch this at your own discretion. If you're a parent... You should probably stay away from this. You have been warned.

"Hereditary" Review

Raymond Thang June 8, 2018
Comment
the-tale-laura-dern.jpg

"The Tale" Review

Content warning: rape, child abuse

"The Tale" is based on the true story of writer/director Jennifer Fox's experience with abuse. Laura Dern gives a career-defining performance as an internally conflicted Jennifer Fox as she investigates the mysteries of her childhood. The events of the movie unravel simultaneously through flashbacks and through present day beats. We feel like we know more than what she knows but we're hoping it's not true. This impending dread one feels while watching the film along with the movie's surreal editing and sound design (both of which may be repeated and altered based on the psychological impact of what gets revealed) results in a highly complex understanding of Fox's feelings towards her abusers and the abusers themselves. 

A lot of the writing does struggle to find its footing as we get scenes upon scenes of characters talking to each other as though they were explaining their lives to an outsider. At times, it feels unnatural to the point of being inauthentic. Isabelle Nélisse's crucial performance as 13 year old Jennifer Fox, although quiet and stoic in nature, fails to capture the subtlety that was needed, in my opinion. But her portrayal is still serviceable and the same can be said for Common's somewhat mediocre portrayal of Jennifer’s fiancé.

The Tale is a visceral experience and an extremely well realized exploration of memory. Jennifer Fox's tale is worth telling even though the somewhat on-the-nose exposition-heavy dialogue and stiff performances can break the immersion. This is a case of where the story of the film soars above the film's flaws. Although it will be extremely hard to sit through for most people, The Tale is a must watch to understand the nuances between victims and abusers, and how delicate and malleable memory can be.

"The Tale" Review

Raymond Thang May 28, 2018
Comment
deadpool-2-review_7fbf.jpg

"Deadpool 2" Review

Not unlike the first Deadpool, its sequel is generic plot laced with some spoof humour and fun characters. If you've seen the first one and loved it, you'll probably love this one as well. That being said, "Deadpool 2" makes fun of clichés and criticizes superhero action movies -yet, it falls into the same clichés that it criticizes which makes me wonder what the point of it all was. 

This goes without saying but Ryan Reynolds is perfect as Deadpool. He's borderline annoying but his character and performance has enough nuance to care about. Zazie Beetz's Domino is a joy to watch but, due to the nature of the character, is a boring ass Mary Sue. The movie points this out but, as mentioned before, does nothing about it. It's lazy writing, yes but... well, there's no but. Apparently that's the joke? Josh Brolin's Cable is pretty edgy and he's the perfect straight man trope type character. It's cute to have him on screen with Deadpool but once you really isolate the character on its own and ignore what you might know from the comics, he's kind of simple and boring. 

Besides having two great action scenes in it and some fun meta music cues, Deadpool 2 is brought down by its never-ending barrage of pop references, hollow side characters, an emotionless love story and lacks the storytelling chops of other contemporary action movies. Again, if you liked the first one, you'll probably like this one. 

"Deadpool 2" Review

Raymond Thang May 20, 2018
Comment
2018_03_02_41591_1519982334._large.jpg

"Avengers: Infinity War" Review

Let me just say this. If you haven't been following along with the 18 other movies that lead up to this, Avengers: Infinity War will probably make very little sense to you and will feel like a super expensive action spectacle with weird tonal shifts and lots of important looking, narratively unbalanced characters doing fun action-hero-looking stuff. If this is you, then you should not watch this movie. Infinity War fails as a standalone movie due to its reliance on the lore and characters that have been established over the last 10 years. However, it definitely succeeds as a sequel movie to a major episodic film franchise.

From the directors of the last two Captain America movies, the Russo brothers have once again delivered a stellar, well choreographed, well shot, and well edited action movie. Although a lot of the action scenes in the movie feel like filler (and they totally are just that), they always look great and feel very kinetic and exciting. In my opinion, the Russo brothers are some of the best contemporary action directors out there. For those who had difficulty keeping up with the frantic action of Winter Soldier and Civil War, you can rest easy knowing that they've decided to stick with longer takes and less cutting to maintain that sense of geography. That's key when you've got hundreds of characters fighting each other in the same scene at once. Well done.

Another thing I really love about this movie are some of the character introductions. They feel super heroic in the most romantic sense and the feeling is so pure and raw and bad ass. But then there are some characters who are just there and get really boring and crappy introductions and if you're a fan of those specific characters, you will be let down. 

From a writing standpoint, some of these characters make weird choices that are counter intuitive to who they are and, looking at the big picture, I feel that those beats were written in to cause more action set pieces for the sake of showing action set pieces or were done to prevent certain characters from meeting up. It's kinda of like an episode from a TV show with a clear A plot and B plot, and C plot and D plot etc. As mentioned before, there are weird tonal shifts where there'll be super funny jokes during dramatic scenes and it's more apparent than ever now. It doesn't work except for this one part with Thor (maybe you'll know which scene I'm referring to or maybe not because it's hard to talk about this without spoilers so whatever). 

Marvel has been cursed with terrible, forgettable, soulless villains. Thanos isn't terrible or forgettable and he's definitely not Soulless (there's a pun in there somewhere). He's one of the better villains in the MCU and I liked how the movie humanizes him. That being said, his motivation is hard to get behind and I don't really agree with the choices that were made at a script level. He's definitely an incredibly hard character to write and they had an opportunity to keep his original comic book motivation still intact using a certain character from another movie to be that character that was missing in this movie. But they didn't. In my opinion, that would've made Thanos, dare I say, relatable. Thanos has four henchmen. Besides acting as catalysts to some great looking action set pieces, they feel superficial and one-dimensional. 

The exposition isn't bad but can be heavy at times. There was one scene in particular that has a character reveal and you understand how they got there but they are merely there for exposition and it's really dumb. Just like Thor's hot tub adventures in Age of Ultron, Thor's plot in Infinity War slows the somewhat slow but well paced almost 3-hour narrative to a crawl. It's really disappointing and it's a lot of down time that could've been spent on something else, in my opinion. 

For a film franchise that has been repeatedly criticized for lacking stakes, Infinity War shows us that no one in the movie is safe. That's cool. I love the ending and it makes me more invested in its narrative than ever before. It's not my favourite Marvel movie, but it's currently up there with Winter Soldier, Civil War, Homecoming, and Black Panther. I think it's the best Avengers movie yet and it's definitely a must-see for super hero aficionados. 

PS there's only one end credits scene and it comes at the very end. So don't panic if you don't see anything after the first set of credits.

"Avengers: Infinity War" Review

Raymond Thang April 27, 2018
Comment
isle_of_dogs_still_20.jpg

"Isle of Dogs" Review

I recommend reading Angie Han's article on the troubling sociopolitical aspects concerning the film's use of the Japanese culture on Mashable "Why is Wes Anderson's 'Isle of Dogs' set in Japan? We're not sure either." and encourage others to do their own research on the matter. As a non-Japanese person, I think the movie seems and feels tone deaf by intentionally alienating its Japanese characters and refusing to provide subtitles for most of their dialogue and by having English interpreters speak over the Japanese dialogue and muffling the audio of the Japanese actors. This is weird and very uncomfortable. Maybe it's intended to be a metaphor for Japanese internment camps but there isn't enough evidence in the text that would clearly suggest that in my opinion. Beyond that, there doesn't seem to be any good reason to set this movie in a dystopian Japan.

The movie itself is very disappointing. Viewers who've stuck with Wes Anderson's filmography for any amount of time will quickly grasp the style of his stories. A Wes Anderson movie usually follows disillusioned youth set to folk-y music ornamented by extremely photogenic and symmetrical camera work and has with a lot of slick monotone dialogue delivery. This is Wes Anderson's shit and he's hellbent on sticking with that style through thick and thin. Although stop-motion animation brings a lot of irresistible charm to its setting and characters (think Fantastic Mr. Fox), the movie is stacked high with terribly delivered monotonous exposition of literally what the character is doing in the moment/how they feel/and what they plan to do. There's no mystery and it feels like the script is bending over backwards doing its damnest to make its audience not feel like total dumb asses. One particularly offensive moment is a scene in which the dog, Chief (played brilliantly by Bryan Cranston) explains his backstory. We expect the movie to cut to a flashback (since it's been doing that a lot anyway) and we could've gotten the conflict in his character through his past by showing us his story. Instead, the film stays focused on a single shot of a dog explaining his backstory to us. This is lazy writing and lazy film making. There are a lot of scenes like these and they just keep coming.

The script also had trouble juggling its characters. In the main pack, we know about the Bryan Cranston dog, the Edward Norton dog, and the Liev Schreiber dog. The rest of them are simple quirky looking props that offer nothing to the plot. The movie has a talented cast and if it were a live action movie, it probably would've worked. But for the most part the voice acting was dull and uninspiring to sit through with the exception of Bryan Cranston, Harvey Keitel as the leader of the other dog pack, and Greta Gerwig as the white-saviour character. Also Tilda Swinton is in this and the reveal of their character is simply perfect.

There are some things I liked a lot. Alexandre Desplat's score is, as usual, fantastic. He effortlessly combines traditional Japanese instruments with his usual modern western classical style. It's fun to listen to and it works very well in the movie. I also love the animation. Everything just looks amazing and characters move with a lot of nuance. There's a sushi prep scene near the middle of the movie and it looks gorgeous.

Besides its insanely beautiful visuals, Desplat's score, and standout performances from Bryan Cranston, Greta Gerwig, and Harvey Keitel, Isle of Dogs is a simple story that's somehow told in the most boring way possible. Plagued with terrible exposition, underwhelming dialogue, mediocre pacing, and a problematic representation of Japanese people, I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone, not even to the most loyal of Wes Anderson fans.

"Isle of Dogs" Review

Raymond Thang April 7, 2018
Comment
image4.jpg

"A Quiet Place" Review

This is such a special movie.

Dropped in the middle of an mysterious post-apocalyptic monster outbreak, "A Quiet Place" follows a family who've been forced to adapt to a way of living while hunted by a bunch of deadly creatures. The primary way these creatures hunt is by hearing their prey. It's such a neat and simple concept and the movie spends scene after scene building great tension by showing the audience the metaphorical Hitchcockian bomb underneath the table. This is the most basic way to make great suspense and the script understands that very well. Actor/director John Krasinski is extremely skilled behind and in front of the camera. He and co-star/wife Emily Blunt have great chemistry (not just because they're a real life couple). 

Because the movie has very little dialogue, the actors have to rely on expressing their character's emotions through body language and Krasinski and Blunt handle their performances delicately and put a lot of care to make every nuance register on the screen. Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe are just as great as Krasinski and Blunt and they portray a very intimate family dynamic so when the hard moments come, they really hit hard. Also, I'm super happy that a deaf character is played by Simmonds (a deaf actor) and her character's disability plays a crucial role. The film empowers deafness in such a great way (I'm not gonna go into it due to spoilers but holy shit!). Also, that ending is so fucking good. 

Let's talk sound design. It's one of the best sounding movies ever. You can hear every footstep and everything that every character does and it's there to put you on edge. Jump scares are done right and slower scenes feel and sound gorgeous. The music by Marco Beltrami is also pretty decent and is edited extremely well into its beats. 

This movie isn't perfect though. I have issues with some of the weird character decisions during the inciting incident and towards the end that made me question why a bunch of super logical and intelligent characters would do those things during those specific situations. The characters also have and use electricity which doesn't really make much sense if you really think about it.

Overall, A Quiet Place is an extremely well made movie and is a must watch at the movie theatre.

"A Quiet Place" Review

Raymond Thang April 6, 2018
Comment
← NewerOlder →

Search Posts

 

Powered by Squarespace